RCW 43.20B.030: Overpayments and debts due the department—Time limit—Write-offs and compromises

RCWs > Title 43 > Chapter 43.20B > Section 43.20B.030

43.20B.020 << 43.20B.030 >> 43.20B.040

PDFRCW 43.20B.030

Overpayments and debts due the department—Time limit—Write-offs and compromises—Waivers.

(1) Except as otherwise provided by law, including subsection (2) of this section, there will be no collection of overpayments and other debts due the department after the expiration of six years from the date of notice of such overpayment or other debt unless the department has commenced recovery action in a court of law or unless an administrative remedy authorized by statute is in place. However, any amount due in a case thus extended shall cease to be a debt due the department at the expiration of ten years from the date of the notice of the overpayment or other debt unless a court-ordered remedy would be in effect for a longer period.

(2) There will be no collection of debts due the department after the expiration of twenty years from the date a lien is recorded pursuant to RCW 43.20B.080.

(3) The department, at any time, may accept offers of compromise of disputed claims or may grant partial or total write-off of any debt due the department if it is no longer cost-effective to pursue. The department shall adopt rules establishing the considerations to be made in the granting or denial of a partial or total write-off of debts.

(4) Notwithstanding the requirements of RCW 43.20B.630, 43.20B.635, 43.20B.640, and 43.20B.645, the department may waive all efforts to collect overpayments from a client when the department determines that the elements of equitable estoppel as set forth in WAC 388-02-0495, as it existed on January 1, 2012, are met.

[ 2012 c 258 s 1; 2005 c 292 s 5; 2003 c 207 s 1; 1997 c 130 s 5; 1989 c 78 s 4; 1987 c 283 s 6; 1979 c 141 s 308; 1965 ex.s. c 91 s 2. Formerly RCW 74.04.306.]

NOTES:

Conflict with federal requirements—2012 c 258: "If any part of this act is found to be in conflict with federal requirements that are a prescribed condition to the allocation of federal funds to the state, the conflicting part of this act is inoperative solely to the extent of the conflict and with respect to the agencies directly affected, and this finding does not affect the operation of the remainder of this act in its application to the agencies concerned. Rules adopted under this act must meet federal requirements that are a necessary condition to the receipt of federal funds by the state." [ 2012 c 258 s 2.]

Severability—Savings—1987 c 283: See notes following RCW 43.20A.020.